<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking the Window</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacobandreas.net/2006/rethinking-the-window/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacobandreas.net/2006/rethinking-the-window/</link>
	<description>Jacob Andreas</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Davi</title>
		<link>http://jacobandreas.net/2006/rethinking-the-window/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Davi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 22:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jacobandreas.net/?p=26#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Stumbleupon just directed me here.
you're getting some press, sir...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbleupon just directed me here.<br />
you&#8217;re getting some press, sir&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andqso</title>
		<link>http://jacobandreas.net/2006/rethinking-the-window/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>andqso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jacobandreas.net/?p=26#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Call me spoiled, but I don't think I'm quite ready to go mouse-free for my wm yet. I looked at some of the others on xwinman; wmi looks particularly promising. I haven't finished migrating to Linux yet, but when I do I'll definitely try some of those out.

Thanks a lot for the tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me spoiled, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m quite ready to go mouse-free for my wm yet. I looked at some of the others on xwinman; wmi looks particularly promising. I haven&#8217;t finished migrating to Linux yet, but when I do I&#8217;ll definitely try some of those out.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for the tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dosnlinux</title>
		<link>http://jacobandreas.net/2006/rethinking-the-window/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>dosnlinux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jacobandreas.net/?p=26#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Have you looked at ratposion, or other screen concept based window managers? They might be just what you're looking for.

A good place to start looking is http://xwinman.org/ It's a great resource for finding new and different wm's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at ratposion, or other screen concept based window managers? They might be just what you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>A good place to start looking is <a href="http://xwinman.org/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/comments//http://xwinman.org/');" rel="nofollow">http://xwinman.org/</a> It&#8217;s a great resource for finding new and different wm&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andqso</title>
		<link>http://jacobandreas.net/2006/rethinking-the-window/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>andqso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jacobandreas.net/?p=26#comment-14</guid>
		<description>The idea is not to waste screen space on things you're not interested in seeing. A framing system just facilitates doing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea is not to waste screen space on things you&#8217;re not interested in seeing. A framing system just facilitates doing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davi</title>
		<link>http://jacobandreas.net/2006/rethinking-the-window/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Davi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jacobandreas.net/?p=26#comment-13</guid>
		<description>In that scenario, would all of the "frames" be active at the same time?  it seems like THAT would use a lot of memory...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that scenario, would all of the &#8220;frames&#8221; be active at the same time?  it seems like THAT would use a lot of memory&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
